Ryan Reynolds Moves to Dismiss Justin Baldoni’s Lawsuit: “Hurt Feelings Aren’t Grounds for Legal Action”

Actor Rejects Defamation Claims, Asserts First Amendment Rights in Legal Battle Over ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ Character

Reynolds Argues Baldoni’s Lawsuit is an Attempt to Silence His Opinion

---

⚖️ Legal Showdown: Reynolds vs. Baldoni

Hollywood actor and producer Ryan Reynolds has filed a motion to dismiss Justin Baldoni’s lawsuit, arguing that Baldoni’s claims are based on “hurt feelings” rather than legal grounds.

📜 “Calling someone a ‘predator’ is a constitutionally protected opinion,” Reynolds’ legal team stated in court documents, as per Variety.

The lawsuit stems from Baldoni’s claims that Reynolds used the character “Nicepool” in the upcoming film ‘Deadpool & Wolverine’ to mock his “woke feminist” reputation.

🔹 Baldoni’s Allegations:

• Claims Reynolds insulted and berated him, accusing him of “fat-shaming” Blake Lively.
• Accuses Reynolds of calling him a ‘sexual predator’ and pressuring talent agency WME to drop him.
• Alleges a campaign to destroy his career through false accusations.

🔹 Reynolds’ Defense:

• Denies defamation, stating he genuinely believes Baldoni’s behavior is predatory.
• Asserts his right to express strong opinions, especially regarding allegations made by his wife, Blake Lively.
• Labels the lawsuit a ‘burn book of grievances’, attempting to shame him for supporting his wife.

---

🔥 “Hurt Feelings Don’t Make a Lawsuit” – Reynolds’ Motion

Reynolds’ legal team dismissed Baldoni’s claims as “thin-skinned outrage”, emphasizing that expressing disdain towards someone is not defamation.

📢 “The law establishes that calling someone a ‘predator’ amounts to constitutionally protected opinion,” the motion states.

🔹 First Amendment Argument:

• Reynolds’ opinions are protected free speech.
• His criticism of Baldoni does not constitute a false statement of fact.
• “He has every right to believe and say that Baldoni’s actions reflect those of a predator,” the motion argues.

🔹 Legal Precedent:

• Courts have previously ruled that statements of opinion, even strong ones, are not defamation.
• Reynolds’ lawyers argue that public figures must endure harsh criticism without resorting to lawsuits.

---

💥 Hollywood Controversy & Fallout

This lawsuit follows Blake Lively’s December 2024 legal action against Baldoni, where she accused him of:
✔️ Sexual harassment
✔️ Retaliation on a film set
✔️ Creating a toxic work environment

Baldoni responded by suing both Lively and Reynolds, alleging that their accusations were intended to ruin his career.

📢 “This lawsuit is an attempt to silence a man who dared to stand by his wife and believe her,” Reynolds’ legal team stated.

With both sides digging in for a protracted legal battle, this case could set a precedent for defamation suits involving Hollywood personalities.