Vivek Agnihotri Takes a Swipe at John Abraham’s Acting – Why Now?

Must read

- Advertisement -

June 23, 2025: In a surprising and controversial remark, director Vivek Agnihotri has openly criticized actor John Abraham for his performance in their 2007 sports drama Dhan Dhana Dhan Goal. In a recent interview, Vivek claimed that John struggled with basic dialogue delivery, allegedly requesting his lines be shortened because he couldn’t deliver “even five sentences in rhythm.”

The director didn’t stop there—he questioned why actors with limited acting skills are paid crores, sparking intense debate among fans and industry observers.

Netizens React: Irony and Relevance Debated

The remarks have drawn sharp reactions online, with many users calling Agnihotri’s comments ironic and condescending. At the time of the film’s release in 2007, John Abraham was one of Bollywood’s leading stars, known for commercial hits like Dhoom, Garam Masala, and Taxi No. 9211. While John was never hailed as a method actor, his screen presence and mass appeal played a pivotal role in his success.

Also read: Kamath Brothers Back InCred With ₹250 Cr Investment Ahead of IPO

- Advertisement -

On the other hand, Agnihotri’s own filmography during that period included box office failures like Chocolate and Dhan Dhana Dhan Goal itself. Critics and fans argue that publicly belittling an actor nearly two decades later—especially after a dry spell post-The Kashmir Files—seems more like an attempt to stay in the limelight than sincere industry reflection.

“John may not be Al Pacino, but at least he has hits to his name,” one user posted.
“Vivek should try making a hit as big as Dhoom before throwing shade,” added another.

Divided Opinions

While a section of social media agrees with Vivek’s views on underprepared actors in the industry, many find the timing and tone questionable, especially when Agnihotri himself has faced criticism for inconsistent filmmaking quality.

In an industry where reputations are built as much on star power as performance, the debate raises larger questions about artistic merit vs. mass appeal, and whether criticizing long-past collaborations is constructive—or just another PR strategy.


- Advertisement -

More articles

- Advertisement -

Latest article