
Trump Faces Judicial Showdown Over Deportation Flights
A U.S. District Judge has demanded urgent explanations from the Trump administration after two deportation flights proceeded despite a court order temporarily banning removals under the 1798 Alien Enemies Act.
🔹 Judge James Boasberg imposed a two-week halt on deportations
🔹 Flights carrying alleged Venezuelan gang members still landed in El Salvador
🔹 Trump calls for Boasberg’s impeachment, sparking rebuke from Supreme Court Chief Justice John Roberts
The case is now escalating into a major constitutional battle, as concerns grow over executive overreach and judicial independence.
Judge James Boasberg has ordered the Justice Department to submit a detailed timeline of events related to the deportation flights, including:
📌 Exact time of departure from the U.S.
📌 When flights left U.S. airspace
📌 Time of landing in El Salvador
📌 How many individuals were deported solely under the Alien Enemies Act
Boasberg has permitted the submission of classified details under seal, following concerns from the government that publicizing the specifics could compromise ongoing operations.
Hours after Boasberg’s ruling, Trump took to Truth Social, calling for the judge’s impeachment, labeling him a “far-left agitator”.
🗣️ “This so-called judge is a disgrace. Impeach him NOW!” – Trump wrote on Truth Social
However, his remarks prompted a rare public response from Chief Justice John Roberts, who rejected impeachment as a response to judicial decisions.
🗣️ “For more than two centuries, it has been established that impeachment is not an appropriate response to disagreement concerning a judicial decision,” Roberts stated.
Despite Roberts’ statement, House Republicans, including Rep. Brandon Gill, have already introduced articles of impeachment against Boasberg.
The Trump administration used the Alien Enemies Act of 1798—historically invoked during World War II to justify the internment of Japanese, Italian, and German nationals—to justify the rapid deportation of Venezuelan nationals allegedly linked to the Tren de Aragua gang.
However, Judge Boasberg ruled that the Act does not support Trump’s claim that Tren de Aragua’s presence constitutes an act of war.
Meanwhile, Venezuela has condemned the deportations as “completely illegal”, with Vice President Delcy Rodríguez accusing Washington of violating migrants’ rights.
📌 U.S. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has threatened additional sanctions on Venezuela if the government refuses to accept its deported citizens.
📌 Millions of Venezuelans have fled the country due to political and economic instability, but family members of deportees say U.S. authorities failed to verify case-by-case whether individuals had gang affiliations.
🚨 Key Developments to Watch:
✔️ Justice Department’s response to Boasberg’s timeline demand
✔️ Potential legal escalation over Trump’s use of executive power
✔️ Congressional battle over Boasberg’s impeachment push
✔️ Venezuela’s next diplomatic move following U.S. sanctions threats
With judicial authority, executive power, and immigration policy colliding, this showdown could reshape U.S. deportation policies and test the limits of presidential authority.
Just over two months after the premiere of his directorial debut, the Netflix series The…
Filmmaker Ram Gopal Varma (RGV) has once again stirred controversy by defending his descriptive comments…
Nine years after her terrifying 2016 Paris robbery, Kim Kardashian made a powerful statement of…
Bollywood icon Aishwarya Rai Bachchan captivated the audience at the Red Sea Film Festival 2025…
Amid concerns over air pollution stressing the body, the choice of dairy milk can play…
India's largest airline, IndiGo, is facing an unprecedented operational crisis, with over 1,000 flights cancelled…